Skip to main content
Welcome. This site supports keyboard navigation and screen readers. Press ? at any time for keyboard shortcuts. Press [ to focus the sidebar, ] to focus the content. High-contrast themes are available via the toolbar.
serard@dev00:~/cv

Full Lifecycle -- One Service, All 22 DSLs

Design study — execution status unverified. This series describes the proposed Ops DSL ecosystem. Code, commands and report outputs are illustrative unless accompanied by source and a dated execution result. A complete 22-DSL sample run has not been established. Current implementation references · Series scope and inventory.

Part 23 introduced the proposed composition. This chapter develops it one attribute group at a time: the declarations a service would supply, the artifacts each group would generate and the cross-DSL checks intended to connect them.

The design goal is to generate the listed artifacts from C# declarations: code, configuration, deployment manifests and verification inputs. The dotnet build, dotnet ops run and report examples below describe the intended workflow; they are not transcripts of a verified end-to-end implementation.


The Starting Point

An empty partial class:

// OrderServiceV3Ops.cs
public partial class OrderServiceV3Ops { }

We will add attributes in four phases. Each phase is a logical group of concerns. The order follows the lifecycle of a service: first you deploy it, then you observe it, then you stress-test it, then you govern it.


Phase 1: Core Operations

The attributes that get a service running, observable, and recoverable.

Deployment (Part 5)

[DeploymentOrchestrator("order-platform", Version = "3.0",
    Apps = new[] { "order-api", "order-worker", "order-scheduler" },
    DependsOn = new[] { "postgres-16", "redis-7", "rabbitmq-3" })]

[DeploymentApp("order-api",
    Image = "order-api",
    Port = 8080,
    Replicas = 3,
    ReadinessPath = "/health/ready",
    LivenessPath = "/health/live")]

[DeploymentApp("order-worker",
    Image = "order-worker",
    Replicas = 2)]

[DeploymentApp("order-scheduler",
    Image = "order-scheduler",
    Replicas = 1,
    CronSchedule = "*/5 * * * *")]

[CanaryStrategy(
    InitialWeight = 5,
    StepWeight = 15,
    StepInterval = "5m",
    ErrorRateThreshold = 1.0,
    LatencyP99Threshold = "500ms")]

Five attributes. The generator produces: Kubernetes Deployment manifests for each app, a Flagger Canary CRD for the canary strategy, a Helm values file, and a deployment ordering DAG that respects the DependsOn chain. The analyzer validates that every DependsOn reference matches a known infrastructure component.

Migration (Part 6)

[SchemaMigration("047_add_order_metadata",
    Up = "ALTER TABLE orders ADD COLUMN metadata jsonb;",
    Down = "ALTER TABLE orders DROP COLUMN metadata;",
    Timeout = "30s")]

[IndexMigration("048_idx_order_metadata",
    Table = "orders",
    Columns = new[] { "metadata" },
    Type = IndexType.GIN,
    Concurrent = true,
    DependsOn = "047_add_order_metadata")]

[DataMigration("backfill_order_metadata",
    DependsOn = "048_idx_order_metadata",
    BatchSize = 1000,
    EstimatedRows = 5_000_000)]

[SeedMigration("seed_order_statuses",
    Table = "order_statuses",
    Data = "pending,processing,completed,cancelled,refunded")]

Four migration steps with explicit dependencies. The generator produces a migration runner that executes them in dependency order, with parallel execution where the DAG allows. The concurrent index creation runs without locking the table. The data migration runs in batches of 1000 to avoid locking 5 million rows.

Observability (Part 7)

[HealthCheck("database",
    Type = HealthCheckType.Dependency,
    Interval = "10s",
    Timeout = "3s",
    FailureThreshold = 3)]

[HealthCheck("redis-cache",
    Type = HealthCheckType.Dependency,
    Interval = "10s",
    Timeout = "2s")]

[HealthCheck("rabbitmq",
    Type = HealthCheckType.Dependency,
    Interval = "15s",
    Timeout = "5s")]

[MetricDefinition("order_created_total",
    Type = MetricType.Counter,
    Description = "Total orders created",
    Labels = new[] { "payment_method", "region" })]

[MetricDefinition("order_processing_duration_seconds",
    Type = MetricType.Histogram,
    Description = "Order processing duration",
    Buckets = new[] { 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 })]

[MetricDefinition("order_queue_depth",
    Type = MetricType.Gauge,
    Description = "Current order processing queue depth")]

[MetricDefinition("payment_gateway_request_duration_seconds",
    Type = MetricType.Histogram,
    Description = "Payment gateway response time",
    Buckets = new[] { 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 })]

[MetricDefinition("order_total_amount",
    Type = MetricType.Histogram,
    Description = "Order monetary value distribution",
    Buckets = new[] { 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 })]

[AlertRule("HighErrorRate",
    Condition = "rate(http_requests_total{status=~'5..'}[5m]) > 0.05",
    Severity = AlertSeverity.Critical,
    NotifyChannel = "ops-critical")]

[AlertRule("SlowQueries",
    Condition = "histogram_quantile(0.99, order_processing_duration_seconds) > 5",
    Severity = AlertSeverity.Warning,
    NotifyChannel = "ops-warnings")]

[AlertRule("QueueBackpressure",
    Condition = "order_queue_depth > 1000",
    Severity = AlertSeverity.Warning,
    NotifyChannel = "ops-warnings")]

[GrafanaDashboard("order-service-overview",
    Rows = new[] { "throughput", "latency", "errors", "dependencies" })]

Thirteen attributes. The generator produces: ASP.NET health check registrations, IMeterFactory metric declarations, Prometheus alerting rules, and a Grafana dashboard JSON model. The analyzer cross-references: every [MetricDefinition] used in an [AlertRule] must exist. Every dependency in [HealthCheck] must match a [DependsOn] target in the deployment.

Configuration and Resilience (Part 8)

[EnvironmentTransform("Development",
    Setting = "ConnectionStrings:Orders", Value = "Host=localhost;Port=5432;Database=orders_dev")]
[EnvironmentTransform("Staging",
    Setting = "ConnectionStrings:Orders", Value = "Host=pg-staging;Database=orders_stg")]
[EnvironmentTransform("Production",
    Setting = "ConnectionStrings:Orders", Source = SecretSource.KeyVault,
    SecretName = "order-db-connection-string")]
[EnvironmentTransform("Production",
    Setting = "PaymentGateway:ApiKey", Source = SecretSource.KeyVault,
    SecretName = "payment-api-key")]

[SecretRotation("order-db-connection-string",
    Provider = SecretProvider.AzureKeyVault,
    RotationInterval = "90d",
    GracePeriod = "7d")]
[SecretRotation("payment-api-key",
    Provider = SecretProvider.AzureKeyVault,
    RotationInterval = "30d",
    GracePeriod = "3d")]

[CircuitBreaker(typeof(IPaymentGateway),
    FailureThreshold = 5,
    BreakDuration = "30s",
    SamplingWindow = "60s")]

[RetryPolicy(typeof(IRabbitMqPublisher),
    MaxRetries = 3,
    BackoffType = BackoffType.Exponential,
    InitialDelay = "100ms")]

[RollbackPlan(
    Trigger = "error_rate > 5%",
    Strategy = RollbackStrategy.Canary,
    AutoRollback = true)]

Nine attributes. The generator produces: appsettings.{Environment}.json transforms, Key Vault secret references, Polly resilience pipelines wrapping the target interfaces as Injectable decorators, and a rollback script triggered by the canary error threshold.

Phase 1 total: 31 attributes. The service deploys, migrates, is observable, configurable, and resilient. Every generated artifact is consistent with every other because they share the same source declarations.


Phase 2: Performance and Reliability

The attributes that prove the service works under stress and attack.

Performance (Part 9)

[ServiceLevelIndicator("availability",
    Metric = "1 - (rate(http_requests_total{status=~'5..'}[5m]) / rate(http_requests_total[5m]))")]
[ServiceLevelIndicator("latency",
    Metric = "histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))")]

[ServiceLevelObjective("availability", Target = 99.9, Window = "30d",
    BurnRateAlert = true, BurnRateThreshold = 14.4)]
[ServiceLevelObjective("latency", Target = 99.0, Window = "30d",
    ThresholdMs = 500)]

[EndpointBudget("POST /api/orders", P95 = "200ms", P99 = "500ms", MaxRPS = 500)]
[EndpointBudget("GET /api/orders/{id}", P95 = "50ms", P99 = "200ms", MaxRPS = 2000)]
[EndpointBudget("GET /api/orders", P95 = "100ms", P99 = "300ms", MaxRPS = 1000)]

[CachePolicy("order-by-id",
    TTL = "5m",
    Strategy = CacheStrategy.ReadThrough,
    InvalidateOn = new[] { "order.updated", "order.cancelled" })]

Eight attributes. The generator produces: Prometheus recording rules for SLIs, multi-burn-rate alert rules for SLOs, and cache configuration with event-driven invalidation.

Load Testing (Part 10)

[LoadTest("Smoke", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.InProcess)]
[LoadProfile(ConcurrentUsers = 10, Duration = "60s")]
[LoadTestEndpoint("POST", "/api/orders")]
[LoadTestThreshold(P95 = "200ms", MaxErrorRate = 0.0)]

[LoadTest("Soak", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.Container)]
[LoadProfile(ConcurrentUsers = 100, Duration = "30m")]
[LoadTestEndpoint("POST", "/api/orders")]
[LoadTestEndpoint("GET", "/api/orders/{id}", Weight = 3)]
[LoadTestThreshold(P95 = "300ms", P99 = "1s", MaxErrorRate = 0.01)]

[LoadTest("Peak", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.Cloud)]
[LoadProfile(ConcurrentUsers = 500, RampUp = "120s", Duration = "15m")]
[LoadTestEndpoint("POST", "/api/orders")]
[LoadTestEndpoint("GET", "/api/orders/{id}", Weight = 3)]
[LoadTestThreshold(P95 = "300ms", P99 = "1s", MaxErrorRate = 0.01)]

Three load test profiles across all three tiers. Smoke runs in-process for fast feedback. Soak runs in Docker for 30 minutes to catch memory leaks. Peak runs in the cloud with distributed k6 for real scale.

Chaos (Part 11)

[ChaosExperiment("PaymentTimeout", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.InProcess,
    Hypothesis = "Order placement degrades gracefully when payment times out")]
[TargetService(typeof(IPaymentGateway))]
[FaultInjection(FaultKind.Timeout, Probability = 0.5, Delay = "5s")]
[SteadyStateProbe(Metric = "order.placement.success_rate", Expected = "> 80%")]

[ChaosExperiment("DatabaseLatency", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.Container,
    Hypothesis = "Order queries complete within 2s with 500ms DB latency")]
[Container("postgres", Image = "postgres:16", Port = 5432)]
[ToxiProxy("postgres-proxy", Upstream = "postgres:5432", ListenPort = 15432)]
[FaultInjection(FaultKind.Latency, Duration = "500ms", Target = "postgres-proxy")]

[ChaosExperiment("AzFailover", Tier = OpsExecutionTier.Cloud,
    Hypothesis = "OrderService recovers within 60s after AZ failure")]
[CloudProvider(CloudProvider.Azure, Region = "westeurope")]
[FaultInjection(FaultKind.AvailabilityZoneFailure, Duration = "5m")]
[AbortCondition(Metric = "order.api.error_rate", Threshold = "30%")]

Three chaos experiments, one per tier. The analyzer validates: the InProcess experiment targets IPaymentGateway, which has a [CircuitBreaker] -- CHS001 passes. The Container experiment targets PostgreSQL, which is in the DependsOn list -- CHS002 passes. The Cloud experiment has an abort condition -- CHS003 passes.

Security (Part 12)

[RbacPolicy("order-admin",
    Roles = new[] { "admin" },
    Operations = new[] { "orders:*" })]
[RbacPolicy("order-reader",
    Roles = new[] { "support", "analytics" },
    Operations = new[] { "orders:read", "orders:list" })]
[RbacPolicy("order-processor",
    Roles = new[] { "worker" },
    Operations = new[] { "orders:process", "orders:update-status" })]
[RbacPolicy("order-refund",
    Roles = new[] { "admin", "finance" },
    Operations = new[] { "orders:refund" })]

[AuditPolicy(
    LogEvents = new[] { "orders:create", "orders:refund", "orders:cancel" },
    RetentionDays = 365)]

[SecretRotation("order-db-connection-string",
    Provider = SecretProvider.AzureKeyVault,
    RotationInterval = "90d")]
[SecretRotation("payment-api-key",
    Provider = SecretProvider.AzureKeyVault,
    RotationInterval = "30d")]

[DastScan(Target = "/api/orders", Profile = DastProfile.Standard)]

Eight attributes. The generator produces: Kubernetes RBAC manifests, OPA policies, audit log schema, and a DAST scan configuration for the CI pipeline.

Phase 2 total: ~27 attributes. The service is performance-baselined, load-tested at three tiers, chaos-tested at three tiers, and secured with RBAC, audit logging, and DAST scanning.


Phase 3: Infrastructure and Data

The attributes that define where the service runs and how its data is managed.

Infrastructure (Part 15)

[ContainerSpec("order-api",
    CPU = "500m", Memory = "512Mi",
    CPULimit = "1000m", MemoryLimit = "1Gi")]
[ContainerSpec("order-worker",
    CPU = "250m", Memory = "256Mi",
    CPULimit = "500m", MemoryLimit = "512Mi")]
[ContainerSpec("order-scheduler",
    CPU = "100m", Memory = "128Mi")]

[PersistentStorage("order-attachments",
    StorageClass = "azure-managed-premium",
    Size = "50Gi",
    AccessMode = AccessMode.ReadWriteOnce)]

[TlsCertificate("orders.example.com",
    Issuer = CertIssuer.LetsEncrypt,
    RenewalDays = 30)]

[DnsRecord("orders.example.com", Type = DnsType.CNAME, Target = "lb.example.com")]
[DnsRecord("orders-internal.example.com", Type = DnsType.A, Target = "10.0.1.100")]

Seven attributes. The generator produces: Kubernetes resource requests/limits in the deployment manifests, PersistentVolumeClaim, cert-manager Certificate CRD, and ExternalDNS annotations.

Networking (Part 16)

[IngressRule("orders.example.com",
    Path = "/api/orders",
    Backend = "order-api:8080",
    TlsSecret = "orders-tls")]

[MtlsPolicy(Mode = MtlsMode.Strict,
    PeerAuthentication = "order-system")]

[FirewallRule("allow-payment-provider",
    Source = "203.0.113.0/24",
    Port = 443,
    Protocol = Protocol.TCP)]
[FirewallRule("allow-internal",
    Source = "10.0.0.0/8",
    Port = 8080,
    Protocol = Protocol.TCP)]

[NetworkPolicy(
    IngressFrom = new[] { "order-api", "order-worker" },
    EgressTo = new[] { "postgres-16", "redis-7", "rabbitmq-3" })]

Five attributes. The generator produces: Kubernetes Ingress resource, Istio PeerAuthentication, Azure NSG rules, and a Kubernetes NetworkPolicy that restricts traffic to only the declared dependencies.

Data Governance (Part 17)

[BackupPolicy(
    Schedule = "0 2 * * *",
    Retention = "30d",
    Type = BackupType.Incremental)]

[RetentionPolicy("orders", Retention = "7y",
    Reason = "Financial records retention requirement")]
[RetentionPolicy("order_events", Retention = "90d",
    Reason = "Event replay window")]
[RetentionPolicy("order_logs", Retention = "30d",
    Reason = "Debugging window")]

[GdprDataMap(
    PersonalDataFields = new[] { "customer_name", "email", "shipping_address" },
    LawfulBasis = LawfulBasis.Contract,
    DataSubjectType = "customer",
    RightToErasure = true)]

[RecoveryObjective(RPO = "1h", RTO = "4h")]

Six attributes. The generator produces: CronJob for backups, pg_dump scripts with retention-based cleanup, GDPR data map documentation, and a disaster recovery runbook with RPO/RTO targets.

Phase 3 total: 18 attributes. The service has defined infrastructure, network boundaries, and data management policies.


Phase 4: Governance and Lifecycle

The attributes that keep the service compliant, cost-effective, and maintainable over its lifetime.

Testing (Part 13)

[TestStrategy(
    Categories = new[] {
        "unit", "integration", "contract", "chaos",
        "load", "security", "smoke", "acceptance" })]

Quality (Part 14)

[QualityGate(
    MaxCyclomaticComplexity = 15,
    MinCodeCoverage = 80,
    MinMutationScore = 60,
    MaxTechDebtHours = 200)]

Compliance (Part 18)

[ComplianceFramework(Framework.SOC2)]
[ComplianceControl("CC6.1", Description = "Logical access security",
    Evidence = "RBAC policies, audit logs")]
[ComplianceControl("CC7.2", Description = "System monitoring",
    Evidence = "Health checks, alert rules, dashboards")]
[ComplianceControl("CC8.1", Description = "Change management",
    Evidence = "Canary deployments, rollback plans")]
[ComplianceControl("CC9.1", Description = "Risk mitigation",
    Evidence = "Chaos experiments, circuit breakers")]

Supply Chain (Part 18)

[SupplyChainPolicy(
    MaxCriticalVulnerabilities = 0,
    MaxHighVulnerabilities = 3,
    SbomFormat = SbomFormat.CycloneDX,
    AllowedLicenses = new[] { "MIT", "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause" })]

Cost (Part 19)

[CostBudget(
    Monthly = 500,
    Currency = "USD",
    AlertThreshold = 80,
    RightSizingReview = "quarterly")]

Capacity (Part 20)

[HorizontalPodAutoscaler(
    MinReplicas = 2,
    MaxReplicas = 20,
    TargetCPU = 70,
    TargetMemory = 80,
    ScaleUpStabilization = "60s",
    ScaleDownStabilization = "300s")]

[RateLimit(
    RequestsPerSecond = 1000,
    BurstSize = 1500,
    KeyStrategy = RateLimitKey.ClientIP)]

Incident (Part 21)

[OnCallRotation(
    Schedule = "weekly",
    Team = "order-team",
    EscalationTimeout = "15m")]

[EscalationPolicy(
    Level1 = "on-call-engineer",
    Level2 = "team-lead",
    Level3 = "engineering-director",
    Level1Timeout = "15m",
    Level2Timeout = "30m")]

API Contract (Part 22)

[ApiVersion(Current = "v3", Minimum = "v1",
    SunsetDate = "2027-01-01")]

Environment Parity (Part 22)

[FeatureFlag("new-payment-flow",
    EnabledIn = new[] { "Development", "Staging" },
    RolloutPercentage = 25)]
[FeatureFlag("async-order-processing",
    EnabledIn = new[] { "Development" })]

[EnvironmentParityRule(
    Rule = "staging-matches-production",
    Exceptions = new[] { "FeatureFlags", "Replicas", "SecretValues" })]

Lifecycle (Part 22)

[SunsetPlan("legacy-auth-endpoint",
    DeprecationDate = "2026-06-01",
    RemovalDate = "2026-12-01",
    MigrationGuide = "/docs/auth-migration")]

[TechDebtItem("payment-retry-hardcoded",
    Effort = "40h",
    Priority = TechDebtPriority.Medium,
    Description = "Replace hardcoded retry delays with Polly configuration")]

Phase 4 total: ~19 attributes. The service is tested, quality-gated, compliant, supply-chain-secured, cost-managed, capacity-planned, incident-ready, API-versioned, environment-consistent, and lifecycle-tracked.


The Complete Class

All four phases together: 95 attributes on one partial class. The complete OrderServiceV3Ops.cs is approximately 250 lines of attribute declarations. No implementation code. No configuration files. No wiki pages. Just typed, compiler-validated attribute declarations.


The Generated Artifact Inventory

The proposed inventory below contains 60 table entries and 62 distinct named file paths. InProcess has 15 entries/files; Container has 20 entries/files; Cloud has 25 entries covering 27 files because its final RBAC entry groups three paths. These counts describe this walkthrough, not an observed build output.

InProcess Tier (15 generated .g.cs files)

File Source DSL Purpose
HealthCheckRegistration.g.cs Observability ASP.NET health check setup
MetricDefinitions.g.cs Observability IMeterFactory metric declarations
PaymentGatewayChaosDecorator.g.cs Chaos DI decorator with fault injection
ChaosRegistration.g.cs Chaos Chaos experiment DI wiring
CircuitBreakerDecorator.g.cs Resilience Polly circuit breaker decorator
RetryPolicyDecorator.g.cs Resilience Polly retry decorator
RateLimiterMiddleware.g.cs Capacity Rate limiting middleware
CacheInterceptor.g.cs Performance Read-through cache decorator
RbacAuthorizationHandler.g.cs Security ASP.NET authorization handler
AuditLogMiddleware.g.cs Security Audit event logging
FeatureFlagConfiguration.g.cs Env Parity Feature flag registrations
EnvironmentTransforms.g.cs Configuration appsettings overrides
LoadTestSmoke.g.cs LoadTesting InProcess load test runner
QualityGateAnalyzer.g.cs Quality Roslyn analyzer for quality rules
ApiVersionMiddleware.g.cs ApiContract Version negotiation middleware

Container Tier (20 intended files)

File Source DSL Purpose
docker-compose.chaos.yaml Chaos Toxiproxy chaos environment
toxiproxy-config.json Chaos Proxy upstream mappings
docker-compose.soak.yaml LoadTesting Soak test environment
k6-soak-test.js LoadTesting k6 soak test script
docker-compose.migration.yaml Migration Migration test environment
docker-compose.integration.yaml Testing Integration test environment
dast-scan-config.yaml Security OWASP ZAP scan configuration
backup-test-config.yaml DataGovernance Backup restore verification
network-test-config.yaml Networking mTLS and firewall verification
parity-check-config.yaml Env Parity Environment drift detection
.env.staging.g Configuration Non-secret env values from [ConfigTransform]
docker-compose.config.yaml Configuration Vault-secret mounts + env-file binding
conftest-policies/soc2.rego Compliance Local OPA rules from [ComplianceControl]
trivy-compliance.yaml Compliance Per-framework Trivy scan profile
docker-compose.canary.yaml Resilience Traefik weighted routing canary
prometheus-canary-rules.yaml Resilience Local SLI rules mirroring AnalysisTemplate
docker-compose.scale.yaml Capacity Replicas + resource limits/reservations
docker-compose.security.yaml Security Hardening overlay (cap_drop, read_only, no-new-privileges)
seccomp-profile.json Security Syscall allow-list per [SecurityPolicy]
apparmor-profile Security AppArmor profile mounted by the overlay

Cloud Tier (25 entries, 27 intended files)

File Source DSL Purpose
terraform/deployment/main.tf Deployment AKS deployment module
terraform/chaos-az-failover/main.tf Chaos Azure Chaos Studio experiment
terraform/load-test/main.tf LoadTesting k6 operator and test run
k8s/deployment.yaml Deployment Kubernetes Deployment manifests
k8s/canary.yaml Deployment Flagger Canary CRD
k8s/hpa.yaml Capacity HorizontalPodAutoscaler
k8s/network-policy.yaml Networking NetworkPolicy
k8s/ingress.yaml Networking Ingress resource
k8s/mtls.yaml Networking Istio PeerAuthentication
k8s/certificate.yaml Infrastructure cert-manager Certificate
k8s/pvc.yaml Infrastructure PersistentVolumeClaim
k8s/litmus-az-failover.yaml Chaos LitmusChaos CRD
k6-peak-traffic.js LoadTesting k6 peak load test script
prometheus/alerts.yaml Observability Helm-wrapped alert rules
grafana/dashboard.json Observability Grafana dashboard model
k8s/configmap.yaml Configuration Non-secret env values from [ConfigTransform]
k8s/external-secret.yaml Configuration Key Vault refs from [Secret]
gatekeeper/constraint-template.yaml Compliance OPA template from [ComplianceControl]
gatekeeper/constraint.yaml Compliance Residency constraint from [DataResidency]
monitoring/servicemonitor.yaml Observability Prometheus Operator scrape target (CRD)
monitoring/prometheusrule.yaml Observability Prometheus Operator alert rules (CRD)
k8s/analysistemplate.yaml Resilience Argo AnalysisTemplate for canary metrics
k8s/vpa.yaml Capacity VerticalPodAutoscaler (CRD)
k8s/keda-scaledobject.yaml Capacity KEDA ScaledObject (CRD)
k8s/serviceaccount.yaml + k8s/role.yaml + k8s/rolebinding.yaml Security RBAC trio per [SecurityPolicy]

Total: 60 proposed artifact entries, representing 62 named file paths for one C# class.


The Analyzer Report

The following is an illustrative report of the checks intended to run during dotnet build:

Build started...

info  DEP001: Deployment orchestrator 'order-platform' has 3 apps, all with health checks
info  DEP002: Canary strategy references error rate metric 'http_requests_total' -- metric exists
info  MIG001: Migration DAG is acyclic: 047 -> 048 -> backfill -> seed
info  OBS001: All 3 health check dependencies match deployment DependsOn targets
info  OBS002: All alert rules reference defined metrics
info  OBS003: Dashboard 'order-service-overview' has panels for all defined metrics
info  CFG001: All 3 environments have connection string transforms
info  CFG002: Production secrets have rotation policies
info  RES001: CircuitBreaker on IPaymentGateway -- timeout matches chaos experiment delay
info  CHS001: CircuitBreaker on IPaymentGateway has chaos experiment 'PaymentTimeout'
info  CHS002: Database dependency 'postgres-16' has chaos experiment 'DatabaseLatency'
info  CHS003: Cloud chaos experiment 'AzFailover' has abort condition
info  PRF001: SLO 'availability' references defined SLI 'availability'
info  PRF002: Endpoint budgets cover all deployment apps with HTTP ports
info  SEC001: RBAC policies cover all API operations
info  SEC002: Audit policy covers all write operations
info  SEC003: Secret rotation intervals within compliance requirements
info  NET001: NetworkPolicy egress matches deployment DependsOn
info  NET002: Ingress TLS secret matches certificate definition
info  DGV001: Backup schedule covers all data retention policies
info  DGV002: RPO (1h) is achievable with backup schedule (daily) + WAL archiving
info  COM001: SOC2 controls CC6.1, CC7.2, CC8.1, CC9.1 have supporting evidence
info  SUP001: SBOM format CycloneDX configured
info  CST001: Cost budget $500/month within cluster capacity
info  CAP001: HPA min replicas (2) >= deployment replicas floor
info  CAP002: Rate limit (1000 rps) matches endpoint budget MaxRPS
info  INC001: Escalation policy has 3 levels with increasing timeouts
info  API001: API version v3 current, v1 minimum -- sunset date 2027-01-01
info  ENV001: Feature flags have environment restrictions
info  ENV002: Parity rule 'staging-matches-production' validated
info  LFC001: Sunset plan 'legacy-auth-endpoint' has deprecation and removal dates

Build succeeded.
    0 Warning(s)
    0 Error(s)

Time Elapsed 00:00:04.21

Thirty-one cross-DSL validations. Zero warnings. Zero errors. Every reference is resolved. Every dependency is satisfied. Every policy is consistent.


The dotnet ops report Output

A single command that summarizes the entire operational posture:

$ dotnet ops report

  OrderService v3.0 -- Operational Posture Report
  ================================================

  Deployment
    Apps:           3 (order-api, order-worker, order-scheduler)
    Strategy:       Canary (5% -> 15% steps, 5m intervals)
    Dependencies:   postgres-16, redis-7, rabbitmq-3

  Migrations
    Pending:        4 steps (schema, index, data backfill, seed)
    Estimated:      ~45 minutes (5M row backfill at 1000/batch)

  Observability
    Health Checks:  3 (database, redis, rabbitmq)
    Metrics:        5 (2 counters, 2 histograms, 1 gauge)
    Alerts:         3 (1 critical, 2 warning)
    Dashboard:      order-service-overview (4 rows)

  Resilience
    Circuit Breaker: IPaymentGateway (5 failures / 30s break)
    Retry Policy:    IRabbitMqPublisher (3x exponential from 100ms)
    Rollback:        Auto on error_rate > 5%

  Performance
    SLOs:           availability 99.9% / latency 99% < 500ms
    Endpoints:      3 with budgets (POST 200ms, GET 50ms, LIST 100ms)
    Cache:          1 policy (order-by-id, 5m TTL, event-invalidated)

  Chaos Coverage
    InProcess:      1 experiment (PaymentTimeout)
    Container:      1 experiment (DatabaseLatency)
    Cloud:          1 experiment (AzFailover)
    Coverage:       100% of circuit breakers, 100% of dependencies

  Security
    RBAC:           4 policies (admin, reader, processor, refund)
    Audit:          3 event types, 365d retention
    Secrets:        2 with rotation (90d db, 30d payment key)
    DAST:           Standard profile on /api/orders

  Infrastructure
    CPU:            850m request / 1500m limit (across 3 containers)
    Memory:         896Mi request / 1.75Gi limit
    Storage:        50Gi premium SSD
    TLS:            orders.example.com (Let's Encrypt, 30d renewal)

  Capacity
    HPA:            2-20 replicas (CPU 70%, Memory 80%)
    Rate Limit:     1000 rps (1500 burst)

  Data Governance
    Backup:         Daily incremental, 30d retention
    RPO/RTO:        1h / 4h
    GDPR:           3 personal data fields, right to erasure enabled

  Compliance
    Framework:      SOC2 (4 controls mapped)
    Supply Chain:   0 critical CVE max, CycloneDX SBOM
    Licenses:       MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2, BSD-3

  Cost
    Budget:         $500/month (alert at 80%)
    Review:         Quarterly right-sizing

  Lifecycle
    API:            v3 current, v1 minimum, sunset 2027-01-01
    Sunset Plans:   1 (legacy-auth, removal 2026-12)
    Tech Debt:      1 item (40h, medium priority)
    Feature Flags:  2 (new-payment-flow 25% rollout, async-processing dev-only)

  Intended Artifacts:  62 file paths (15 InProcess, 20 Container, 27 Cloud)
  Inventory Entries:  60 (Cloud RBAC entry groups 3 files)
  Analyzer Results:    31 validations passed, 0 warnings, 0 errors

  Last updated: 2026-04-06T10:15:32Z

This proposed report brings the declarations, intended artifacts and validation results into one view. An implementation and a dated run would be needed to establish that it is generated from the model and updates correctly after a change.

⬇ Download